<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#62;devblog_ &#187; shareware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devblog.itsth.com/category/shareware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devblog.itsth.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on developing shareware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Affiliate Fraud! &#8211; Is it?</title>
		<link>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/11/04/affiliate-fraud-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/11/04/affiliate-fraud-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cookie-Stuffing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devblog.itsth.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently contacted by fellow software developer Michael Bauer, who called my attention to a certain website. That site is an affiliate of mine and I thought that it was my best affiliate. A deeper look however showed that the website placed the usual affiliate cookie not just on the pages displaying my software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently contacted by fellow software developer <a href="http://www.vboffice.net">Michael Bauer</a>, who called my attention to a certain website. That site is an affiliate of mine and I thought that it was my best affiliate.</p>
<p>A deeper look however showed that the website placed the usual affiliate cookie not just on the pages displaying my software, but on all. Each and every page that I visited (it&#8217;s a big site), had the cookie-setting-code. And not just for me, but for a number of other software vendors, too. The cookies expire in half a year.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Sourcecode" src="http://www.easy2sync.com/img/blog/AffiliateProblem.jpg" alt="" width="439" height="276" /></p>
<p>In other words: Every person that visits any page of that website, would bring the website owner a provision if the visitor should decide to buy any software from any of the listed vendors within the next 6 month.</p>
<p>Previously I had thought, because of the sales, that this was my best affiliate. Now however, I have my doubts how many sales he *really* generated and for how many he just got the money.</p>
<p><strong>Is this okay?</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. Is this a violation of the terms or even illegal behavior? Well, so far Share-it (who handles the affiliate system) says that this okay and that I&#8217;m free to terminate my cooperation with the affiliate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert (even though I&#8217;m probably involuntarily on the road to become one, sigh) on this topics but on this seems similar to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookie_stuffing">Cookie-Stuffing</a>, so I won&#8217;t give up so easily on this and post updates on this.</p>
<p>But untill then, if you have an affiliate program, you should <strong>check your affiliates&#8217; websites</strong>, especially those that you think are your best ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/11/04/affiliate-fraud-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista doesn&#8217;t like Demos</title>
		<link>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/09/14/vista-doesnt-like-demos/</link>
		<comments>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/09/14/vista-doesnt-like-demos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devblog.itsth.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista is known to be &#8220;special&#8221; in some aspects. What&#8217;s perhaps not so well-known is that it doesn&#8217;t like anything called &#8220;Demo&#8221;. In fact, it will show an increased warning level for any installation file that has &#8220;_demo&#8221; in the filename. A signed installer name &#8220;test_demo.exe&#8221; will generate a red warning. If you rename it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista is known to be &#8220;special&#8221; in some aspects. What&#8217;s perhaps not so well-known is that it doesn&#8217;t like anything called &#8220;Demo&#8221;. In fact, it will show an increased warning level for any installation file that has &#8220;_demo&#8221; in the filename.</p>
<p>A signed installer name &#8220;test_demo.exe&#8221; will generate a red warning. If you rename it to &#8220;test_trial.exe&#8221;, you&#8217;ll only get a yellow warning. Don&#8217;t ask me why, I got no idea (please contact me if YOU have). But I don&#8217;t call my demo &#8220;demo&#8221; any more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devblog.itsth.com/2008/09/14/vista-doesnt-like-demos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

